Why DRI?

DRI tirelessly advocates for the valuable role attorneys play in representing businesses and individuals in civil matters. DRI is committed to enhancing the skills and professionalism of defense attorneys. Click below to learn why membership in DRI is the best investment you can make in yourself.
 

DRI Sponsorship Opportunities

Learn More

DRI Online Programming

Learn More

DRI Seminars

Learn More

Find a Lawyer

Learn More

DRI is the leading organization of civil defense attorneys and in-house counsel.

DRI President John Cuttino’s Letter to House Judiciary Chair Bob Goodlatte on HR 985, the Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017

  • by DRI
  • Mar 7, 2017, 09:23 AM
DRI President John Cuttino’s Letter to House Judiciary Chair Bob Goodlatte on HR 985, the Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017

In February, the House Judiciary Committee reported the multi-provision HR 985, the Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017.

Among other things, HR 985 would:

  • Limit certification in cases claiming personal injury or economic loss to classes in which all members suffered the same ”type and scope of injury.”
  • Prohibit certification of a class unless there is objective evidence that the relief can actually be distributed to a substantial majority of class members by “administratively feasible” means.
  • Require in any class action that all discovery be stayed during the pendency of any motion to transfer, dismiss or strike class allegations.
  • Permit appeals as of right from orders granting or denying class certification.
  • Attached here is DRI president John Cuttino’s letter to House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte on HR 985. 

DRI President John Cuttino’s Letter to House Judiciary Chair Bob Goodlatte on HR 985, the Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017

  • by DRI
  • Mar 7, 2017, 09:23 AM
DRI President John Cuttino’s Letter to House Judiciary Chair Bob Goodlatte on HR 985, the Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017

In February, the House Judiciary Committee reported the multi-provision HR 985, the Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017.

Among other things, HR 985 would:

  • Limit certification in cases claiming personal injury or economic loss to classes in which all members suffered the same ”type and scope of injury.”
  • Prohibit certification of a class unless there is objective evidence that the relief can actually be distributed to a substantial majority of class members by “administratively feasible” means.
  • Require in any class action that all discovery be stayed during the pendency of any motion to transfer, dismiss or strike class allegations.
  • Permit appeals as of right from orders granting or denying class certification.
  • Attached here is DRI president John Cuttino’s letter to House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte on HR 985.