The Daubert Compendium 2011

The Daubert Compendium 2011: “Fit” (pdf)
The Daubert Compendium 2011: Absence of Scientific Foundation (pdf)
The Daubert Compendium 2011: Acceptance in the Scientific Community (pdf)
The Daubert Compendium 2011: Assumption of Facts by Expert (pdf)
The Daubert Compendium 2011: Expert Testimony: Does It Grow Naturally and Directly from Research Conducted Independent of Litigation? (pdf)
The Daubert Compendium 2011: Expert’s Concept: Has It Been Subjected to Peer Review and Publication? (pdf)
The Daubert Compendium 2011: Expert’s Concept: Has It Been Tested? (pdf)
The Daubert Compendium 2011: Expert’s Concept: What Is the Known or Potential Rate of Error? (pdf)
The Daubert Compendium 2011: Expert’s Field of Expertise: Is It Known to Reach Reliable Results? | Accepted Practice/Reliable Science (pdf)
The Daubert Compendium 2011: General Acceptance Test: The Standard for Ensuring that Reliable Expertise Gets to Jury | Novel Scientific Evidence (pdf)
The Daubert Compendium 2011: Has Expert Adequately Accounted for Obvious Alternative Explanations? (pdf)
The Daubert Compendium 2011: Has Expert Been as Careful as in Regular Professional Work Outside Paid Litigation Consulting? Methodology (pdf)
The Daubert Compendium 2011: Has Expert Unjustifiably Extrapolated from an Accepted Premise to an Unfounded Conclusion? (pdf)
The Daubert Compendium 2011: Lack of Reliable Foundation (pdf)
The Daubert Compendium 2011: Methodology (pdf)
The Daubert Compendium 2011: Nonscientific Testimony (pdf)
The Daubert Compendium 2011: Table of Cases (pdf)
The Daubert Compendium 2011: Table of Contents (pdf)